![]() Perhaps I am misinformed, however, and the T-34 is a super-Ronson when hit. ![]() Most of the time, they just sit there damaged and abandoned. Ive noticed, and I am sure this has historical basis, that some vehicles are rarely completely destroyed by a shot. If it just sits there with a hole in it and a wounded/dead crew member, it simply KO'ed. If a KO'ed tank burns, it is "destroyed". In terms a none-grog like myself could understand, I see this as one would see in CM. Other factors, like better Soviet industry factor in, of course.Īs to Soviet AFV losses the loss data concern's Soviet AFVs lost, as in knocked out at least once, with crew fatalaties, as well as lost as in totaly destroyed & or captured. This was thanks to the ease with which a single T-34 could be manufactured when compared with a Panther. You will surely agree, however, that no matter how high up the organization tables we go, we see more T-34's then Panthers. They fought on an frontage as an Abt or Brigada broken down into Company's then into Plts, then pairs. When I refered to Plt's etc I'm refering to that tanks don't fight alone, not that a Panther Plt or a T-34 Plt acted alone or faced each other singularly. Commissar, disagree away, I disagree with most of yours as well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |